[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-41469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17852555#comment-17852555
 ] 

Yeachan Park edited comment on SPARK-41469 at 6/6/24 6:28 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe a silly question, but I thought the whole point of shuffle migration was 
that it doesn't have to be re-computed. Was nothing being done being done with 
the migrated shuffle blocks prior to this PR? I'm probably misunderstanding 
something


was (Author: JIRAUSER288356):
Maybe a stupid question, but I thought the whole point of shuffle migration was 
that it doesn't have to be re-computed. Was nothing being done being done with 
the migrated shuffle blocks prior to this PR?

> Task rerun on decommissioned executor can be avoided if shuffle data has 
> migrated
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-41469
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-41469
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Spark Core
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.3, 3.2.2, 3.3.1
>            Reporter: wuyi
>            Assignee: wuyi
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.4.0
>
>
> Currently, we will always rerun a finished shuffle map task if it once runs 
> the lost executor. However, in the case of the executor loss is caused by 
> decommission, the shuffle data might be migrated so that task doesn't need to 
> rerun.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to