[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-48580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot reassigned SPARK-48580:
--------------------------------------

    Assignee:     (was: Apache Spark)

> Add consistency check and fallback for mapIds in push-merged block meta
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-48580
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-48580
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Shuffle
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0, 3.3.0, 3.4.0, 3.5.0
>            Reporter: gaoyajun02
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: image-2024-06-11-10-19-57-227.png
>
>
> When push-based shuffle enabled, 0.03% of the spark application in our 
> cluster experienced shuffle data loss. The metrics of Exchange as follows:
> !image-2024-06-11-10-19-57-227.png|width=405,height=170!
> We eventually found some WARN logs on the shuffle server:
>  
> {code:java}
> WARN shuffle-server-8-216 
> org.apache.spark.network.shuffle.RemoteBlockPushResolver: Application 
> application_xxxx shuffleId 0 shuffleMergeId 0 reduceId 133 update to 
> index/meta failed{code}
>  
> And analyzed the cause from the code:
> The merge metadata obtained by the reduce side from the driver comes from the 
> {{mapTracker}} in the server's memory, while the actual reading of chunk data 
> is based on the records in the shuffle server's {{{}metaFile{}}}. There is no 
> consistency check between the two.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to