[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14521729#comment-14521729
 ] 

Andrew Ash commented on SPARK-7263:
-----------------------------------

[~massie] this is really exciting work!  Thinking through the conversion costs 
between row-oriented and column-oriented data, it seems like avoiding those and 
sending more compact column-oriented blocks between executors might have 
noticeable performance improvements.  Was perf a motivator for you building 
this?

For integrating this into Spark, the first preference from the team would 
probably be to make this a plugin in an external repository such as 
spark-packages.org, especially since you're using an already-existing plugin 
point.  I think I saw some changes you had to make in the core code though (not 
just the shuffle.parquet package) so we'd need to decide if the plugin point 
needed to be extended to support this new shuffle manager, of if it's better to 
integrate this into core spark maintained by the Apache team.

> Add new shuffle manager which stores shuffle blocks in Parquet
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-7263
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7263
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Block Manager
>            Reporter: Matt Massie
>
> I have a working prototype of this feature that can be viewed at
> https://github.com/apache/spark/compare/master...massie:parquet-shuffle?expand=1
> Setting the "spark.shuffle.manager" to "parquet" enables this shuffle manager.
> The dictionary support that Parquet provides appreciably reduces the amount of
> memory that objects use; however, once Parquet data is shuffled, all the
> dictionary information is lost and the column-oriented data is written to 
> shuffle
> blocks in a record-oriented fashion. This shuffle manager addresses this issue
> by reading and writing all shuffle blocks in the Parquet format.
> If shuffle objects are Avro records, then the Avro $SCHEMA is converted to 
> Parquet
> schema and used directly, otherwise, the Parquet schema is generated via 
> reflection.
> Currently, the only non-Avro keys supported is primitive types. The reflection
> code can be improved (or replaced) to support complex records.
> The ParquetShufflePair class allows the shuffle key and value to be stored in
> Parquet blocks as a single record with a single schema.
> This commit adds the following new Spark configuration options:
> "spark.shuffle.parquet.compression" - sets the Parquet compression codec
> "spark.shuffle.parquet.blocksize" - sets the Parquet block size
> "spark.shuffle.parquet.pagesize" - set the Parquet page size
> "spark.shuffle.parquet.enabledictionary" - turns dictionary encoding on/off
> Parquet does not (and has no plans to) support a streaming API. Metadata 
> sections
> are scattered through a Parquet file making a streaming API difficult. As 
> such,
> the ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator has been modified to fetch the entire contents
> of map outputs into temporary blocks before loading the data into the reducer.
> Interesting future asides:
> o There is no need to define a data serializer (although Spark requires it)
> o Parquet support predicate pushdown and projection which could be used at
>   between shuffle stages to improve performance in the future



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to