[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14610376#comment-14610376
]
Alexis Seigneurin commented on SPARK-4557:
------------------------------------------
Yes, but the problem is not compiling Spark's code with this API change.
The problem is about compiling Java code that is using the updated
JavaDStreamLike interface: either the Java code does not compile, or you break
the API. None is ideal.
> Spark Streaming' foreachRDD method should accept a VoidFunction<...>, not a
> Function<..., Void>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-4557
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4557
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Streaming
> Affects Versions: 1.1.0
> Reporter: Alexis Seigneurin
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: starter
>
> In *Java*, using Spark Streaming's foreachRDD function is quite verbose. You
> have to write:
> {code:java}
> .foreachRDD(items -> {
> ...;
> return null;
> });
> {code}
> Instead of:
> {code:java}
> .foreachRDD(items -> ...);
> {code}
> This is because the foreachRDD method accepts a Function<JavaRDD<...>, Void>
> instead of a VoidFunction<JavaRDD<...>>. This would make sense to change it
> to a VoidFunction as, in Spark's API, the foreach method already accepts a
> VoidFunction.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
