[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14662086#comment-14662086
]
Xiangrui Meng commented on SPARK-9658:
--------------------------------------
1. Let's maintain binary compatibility. LDA was introduced in 1.3. This break
change could be avoided.
3. Just want to spend some extra time on it. For example, if we remove the
usage from examples, does this bug still happen?
> ML 1.5 QA: API: Binary incompatible changes
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-9658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9658
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ML, MLlib
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0
> Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
> Assignee: Xiangrui Meng
> Priority: Blocker
>
> Generated a list of binary incompatible changes using MiMa and filter out
> some false positives:
> 1. LDA.docConcentration
> It will be nice to keep the old APIs unchanged. For example, we can use
> “asymmetricDocConcentration”. Then “getDocConcentration" would return the
> first item if the concentration vector is a constant vector.
> 2. LDAModel.gammaShape / topicConcentration
> Should be okay if we assume that no one extends LDAModel.
> 3. Params.setDefault
> If we have time to investigate this issue. We should put it back.
> 4. LogisticRegressionModel.threshold is missing.
> 5. LogisticRegression.setThreshold shouldn't be in the Params trait. We need
> to override it anyway.
> Will create sub-tasks for each item.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
