[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14728427#comment-14728427 ]
Vinod KC commented on SPARK-10199: ---------------------------------- [~mengxr] could you please check the above micro-benchmarks and give your suggestions? > Avoid using reflections for parquet model save > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: SPARK-10199 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10199 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ML, MLlib > Reporter: Feynman Liang > Priority: Minor > > These items are not high priority since the overhead writing to Parquest is > much greater than for runtime reflections. > Multiple model save/load in MLlib use case classes to infer a schema for the > data frame saved to Parquet. However, inferring a schema from case classes or > tuples uses [runtime > reflection|https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/d7b4c095271c36fcc7f9ded267ecf5ec66fac803/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala#L361] > which is unnecessary since the types are already known at the time `save` is > called. > It would be better to just specify the schema for the data frame directly > using {{sqlContext.createDataFrame(dataRDD, schema)}} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org