[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xiao Li updated SPARK-12975:
----------------------------
    Description: 
When users are using partitionBy and bucketBy at the same time, some bucketing 
columns might be part of partitioning columns. For example, 
{code}
        df.write
          .format(source)
          .partitionBy("i")
          .bucketBy(8, "i", "k")
          .sortBy("k")
          .saveAsTable("bucketed_table")
{code}

However, in the above case, adding column `i` into `bucketBy` is useless. It is 
just wasting extra CPU when reading or writing bucket tables. Thus, like Hive, 
we can issue an exception and let users do the change. 

  was:
When users are using partitionBy and bucketBy at the same time, some bucketing 
columns might be part of partitioning columns. For example, 
{code}
        df.write
          .format(source)
          .partitionBy("i")
          .bucketBy(8, "i", "k")
          .sortBy("k")
          .saveAsTable("bucketed_table")
{code}

However, in the above case, adding column `i` is useless. It is just wasting 
extra CPU when reading or writing bucket tables. Thus, we can automatically 
remove these overlapping columns from the bucketing columns. 


> Throwing Exception when Bucketing Columns are part of Partitioning Columns
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-12975
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12975
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Xiao Li
>
> When users are using partitionBy and bucketBy at the same time, some 
> bucketing columns might be part of partitioning columns. For example, 
> {code}
>         df.write
>           .format(source)
>           .partitionBy("i")
>           .bucketBy(8, "i", "k")
>           .sortBy("k")
>           .saveAsTable("bucketed_table")
> {code}
> However, in the above case, adding column `i` into `bucketBy` is useless. It 
> is just wasting extra CPU when reading or writing bucket tables. Thus, like 
> Hive, we can issue an exception and let users do the change. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to