[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15180544#comment-15180544 ]
Sean Owen commented on SPARK-13684: ----------------------------------- The alternative is AtomicDouble I suppose. If that's true, it's not necessary indeed. Is it worth it for future proofing or is this just not something that could break? then it can be dismissed as a false positive. > Possible unsafe bytesRead increment in StreamInterceptor > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SPARK-13684 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13684 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Spark Core > Reporter: holdenk > Priority: Trivial > > We unsafely increment a volatile (bytesRead) in a call back, if two call > backs are triggered we may under count bytesRead. This issue was found using > coverity. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org