Josh Rosen created SPARK-13695:
----------------------------------

             Summary: Don't cache blocks at different serialization level when 
reading back from disk
                 Key: SPARK-13695
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13695
             Project: Spark
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Block Manager
            Reporter: Josh Rosen
            Assignee: Josh Rosen


When a cached block is spilled to disk and read back in serialized form (i.e. 
as bytes), the current BlockManager implementation will attempt to re-insert 
the serialized block into the MemoryStore even if the block's storage level 
requests deserialized caching.

This behavior adds some complexity to the MemoryStore but I don't think it 
offers many performance benefits and I'd like to remove it in order to simplify 
a larger refactoring patch. Therefore, I propose to change the behavior such 
that disk store reads will only cache bytes in the memory store for blocks with 
serialized storage levels.

There are two places where we request serialized bytes from the BlockStore:

1. getLocalBytes(), which is only called when reading local copies of 
TorrentBroadcast pieces. Broadcast pieces are always cached using a serialized 
storage level, so this won't lead to a mismatch in serialization forms if 
spilled bytes read from disk are cached as bytes in the memory store.

2. the non-shuffle-block branch in getBlockData(), which is only called by the 
NettyBlockRpcServer when responding to requests to read remote blocks. Caching 
the serialized bytes in memory will only benefit us if those cached bytes are 
read before they're evicted and the likelihood of that happening seems low 
since the frequency of remote reads of non-broadcast cached blocks seems very 
low. Caching these bytes when they have a low probability of being read is bad 
if it risks the eviction of blocks which are cached in their expected 
serialized/deserialized forms, since those blocks seem more likely to be read 
in local computation.

Therefore, I think this is a safe change.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to