[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15187835#comment-15187835
]
Sean Owen commented on SPARK-13775:
-----------------------------------
In practice, this is tiny no matter what, but in principle: It's an extra bit
of noise, and anyone finding the other JIRA has to find this one to see what
really happened.
I suggested sorting by (start) time in the other PR, and you seemed to agree.
But then you merged the change, intending to overwrite it entirely. It wasn't a
case of incremental improvement followed by more substantive improvement, which
sounds fine, or else simply deciding later to implement a different behavior.
It would have been easier to not merge the change and ask the PR author to
update it instead.
> history server sort by completed time by default
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-13775
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13775
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Web UI
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Thomas Graves
> Priority: Trivial
>
> The new history server ui using datatables sorts by application Id. Lets
> change it to sort by completed time like it did with the old table format.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
