[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15197451#comment-15197451
 ] 

Nicholas Chammas commented on SPARK-7481:
-----------------------------------------

(Sorry Steve; can't comment on your proposal since I don't know much about 
these kinds of build decisions.)

Just to add some more evidence to the record that this problem appears to 
affect many people, take a look at this: 
http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=%5Bapache-spark%5D+S3+Hadoop+2.6

Lots of confusion about how to access S3, with the recommended solution as 
before being to [use Spark built against Hadoop 
2.4|http://stackoverflow.com/a/30852341/877069].

> Add Hadoop 2.6+ profile to pull in object store FS accessors
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-7481
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7481
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Build
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.1
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>
> To keep the s3n classpath right, to add s3a, swift & azure, the dependencies 
> of spark in a 2.6+ profile need to add the relevant object store packages 
> (hadoop-aws, hadoop-openstack, hadoop-azure)
> this adds more stuff to the client bundle, but will mean a single spark 
> package can talk to all of the stores.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to