[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-1004:
---------------------------------

    Affects Version/s: 4.3.x

Set 4.3.x in Affects Version/s.

> remove _RWSTD_NO_CLASS_PARTIAL_SPEC and workarounds
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STDCXX-1004
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1004
>             Project: C++ Standard Library
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 4.3.x
>            Reporter: Martin Sebor
>            Assignee: Eric Lemings
>             Fix For: 4.3.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> Similarly to STDCXX-978, we should remove all config tests for partial 
> specialization and clean up conditionally compiled code that depends on the 
> config macros:
>  * 
> [{{\_RWSTD_NO_CLASS_PARTIAL_SPEC}}|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/etc/config/src/CLASS_PARTIAL_SPEC.cpp]
>  * 
> [{{\_RWSTD_NO_FUNC_PARTIAL_SPEC}}|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/etc/config/src/FUNC_PARTIAL_SPEC.cpp]
> Here's where I see them in my local copy:
> {noformat}
> $ (cd ~/stdcxx-4.3.x && find . -type f ! -path "*/.svn/*" ! -name "*~" | 
> xargs grep -l _PARTIAL_)
> ./etc/config/src/VA_LIST.cpp
> ./src/vecbool.cpp
> ./examples/include/examples.h
> ./tests/containers/23.vector.cons.cpp
> ./tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
> ./tests/include/rw_alg_test.h
> ./include/list
> ./include/string
> ./include/algorithm.cc
> ./include/ostream
> ./include/vector.cc
> ./include/limits
> ./include/#vector#
> ./include/vector
> ./include/deque
> ./include/algorithm
> ./include/rw/_defs.h
> ./include/rw/_iterbase.h
> ./include/rw/_select.h
> ./include/rw/_iterator.h
> ./include/rw/_tree.h
> ./include/rw/_config.h
> ./include/rw/_allocator.h
> ./include/rw/_algobase.h
> ./ChangeLog
> ./README
> {noformat}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to