[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16145626#comment-16145626 ]
Alexandre Vermeerbergen commented on STORM-1757: ------------------------------------------------ Hello, Yes, I am still interested in Beam Runner for Storm because I think that this feature would help comparing the various stream processing engines against a same application (without any need to rewrite the application). Such comparison could benefit to Storm community because I feel that Storm is appropriate for lots of throughput-driven use cases. But maybe it could also be an incentive for Storm developers to try matching other engines' capacities, as proposed in Beam's Runners matrix at: https://beam.apache.org/documentation/runners/capability-matrix. Alexandre Vermeerbergen > Apache Beam Runner for Storm > ---------------------------- > > Key: STORM-1757 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1757 > Project: Apache Storm > Issue Type: Brainstorming > Reporter: P. Taylor Goetz > Priority: Minor > Time Spent: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > This is a call for interested parties to collaborate on an Apache Beam [1] > runner for Storm, and express their thoughts and opinions. > Given the addition of the Windowing API to Apache Storm, we should be able to > map naturally to the Beam API. If not, it may be indicative of shortcomings > of the Storm API that should be addressed. > [1] http://beam.incubator.apache.org -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)