[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16349373#comment-16349373
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-2914:
-------------------------------------
[~Srdo]
You've got my points. Thanks for reading my comment thoughtfully.
Regarding commit in ack(), we may need to take into consideration that unlike
nextTuple() it is called only when spout receives ack. It should be easiest one
but we don't want to commit every ack (acks may not come sequentially, and
performance matters). But if we apply timer to ack(), we need to deal with edge
case: not yet timed-out but received some acks afterwards which are "last"
acks. Possible to deal with, but might be tricky. That's why I mentioned hybrid
approach - allowing commit to Kafka in both nextTuple() and ack(), which still
has such edge case as well but the chance is much smaller.
> Remove enable.auto.commit support from storm-kafka-client
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-2914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2914
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: storm-kafka-client
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.2.0
> Reporter: Stig Rohde Døssing
> Assignee: Stig Rohde Døssing
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The enable.auto.commit option causes the KafkaConsumer to periodically commit
> the latest offsets it has returned from poll(). It is convenient for use
> cases where messages are polled from Kafka and processed synchronously, in a
> loop.
> Due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2913 we'd really like to
> store some metadata in Kafka when the spout commits. This is not possible
> with enable.auto.commit. I took at look at what that setting actually does,
> and it just causes the KafkaConsumer to call commitAsync during poll (and
> during a few other operations, e.g. close and assign) with some interval.
> Ideally I'd like to get rid of ProcessingGuarantee.NONE, since I think
> ProcessingGuarantee.AT_MOST_ONCE covers the same use cases, and is likely
> almost as fast. The primary difference between them is that AT_MOST_ONCE
> commits synchronously.
> If we really want to keep ProcessingGuarantee.NONE, I think we should make
> our ProcessingGuarantee.NONE setting cause the spout to call commitAsync
> after poll, and never use the enable.auto.commit option. This allows us to
> include metadata in the commit.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
