[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16427559#comment-16427559
 ] 

Roshan Naik commented on STORM-2983:
------------------------------------

Thanks [~revans2] for those clarifications.

Thanks [~ethanli] for the revised fix.

Similar fixes are needed elsewhere as well, since they are all probably broken:

- 
[https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/StormCommon.java#L276]

- 
[https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/StormCommon.java#L363-L364]
 

- 
[https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/examples/storm-loadgen/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/loadgen/CaptureLoad.java#L109-L112]

- 
[https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/worker/Worker.java#L306]
  

 

 

> Some topologies not working properly 
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-2983
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2983
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ethan Li
>            Assignee: Ethan Li
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> For example,
> {code:java}
> bin/storm jar storm-loadgen-*.jar 
> org.apache.storm.loadgen.ThroughputVsLatency --spouts 1 --splitters 2 
> --counters 1 -c topology.debug=true
> {code}
> on ResourceAwareScheduler not working properly.
> With default cluster settings, there will be only one __acker-executor and it 
> will be on a separate worker. And it looks like the __acker-executor was not 
> able to receive messages from spouts and bolts. And spouts and bolts 
> continued to retry sending messages to acker. It then led to another problem:
> STORM-2970
> I tried to run on storm right before 
> [https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2502] and right after and confirmed 
> that this bug should be related to it



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to