[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1347?page=comments#action_37678 ]
Ted Husted commented on WW-1347: -------------------------------- Hmmm, with s2 defaults, I can set one per package. With extends, I can have as many base mappings as I like, just like we can have as many sets of interceptors as we like. I'm not saying that this much flexibility is necessary or desirable, but we shouldn't consider package defaults a panacea. I still don't think we've addressed the issue of using DynaBeans in S2 head-on. If there are technical issues that cause us to recommend against it, then we should say that. We should also actually try it before dismissing the notion. In practice, a lot of domain object graphs are not appropriate for use as "backing beans". Slapping the properties on the Action can be useful, but it can also be a lot of busywork. Again, we shouldn't consider action-properties and POJO support a panacea. We still have far to go in terms of making web applications truly easy to create and to maintain. -Ted. > SAF1 Features to Implement > -------------------------- > > Key: WW-1347 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1347 > Project: Struts 2 > Type: Task > Components: Documentation > Reporter: Ted Husted > Assignee: Don Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > * Wildcard Action Mappings - Complete > * DynaForm as Model Object > * Extends for action mappings -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
