[ 
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=45538#action_45538
 ] 

Brian Curnow commented on WW-2969:
----------------------------------

In an attempt to build to very small applications that illustrate the problem I 
was seeing I found that the Convention plugin isn't required to get this to not 
work. It looks like since the main DWR page 
(http://localhost:8080/dwr/index.html) has an extension, that Struts is smart 
enough to just delegate to the container. However, when the URL doesn't contain 
an extension (http://localhost:8080/dwr/test/validator) there isn't enough 
information there to tell Struts that it shouldn't be handling that URL.

I've worked around this problem by building a filter that you can map to URLs 
you want the container to handle:

{code}
import java.io.IOException;

import javax.servlet.Filter;
import javax.servlet.FilterChain;
import javax.servlet.FilterConfig;
import javax.servlet.ServletException;
import javax.servlet.ServletRequest;
import javax.servlet.ServletResponse;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;

import org.apache.struts2.RequestUtils;
import org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.ServletDispatcherResult;
import org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.mapper.ActionMapping;

/**
 * Ensures that the request is handled correctly by the servlet container 
instead of by Struts
 */
public class Struts2SkipFilter implements Filter {

        public void destroy() {
                // do nothing
        }

        public void doFilter(ServletRequest servletRequest, ServletResponse 
servletReponse, FilterChain filterChain)
                        throws IOException, ServletException {
                String requestPath = 
RequestUtils.getServletPath((HttpServletRequest) servletRequest);

                // Create a new ActionMapping that points to the request path 
and indicates that the ServletDispatcher should handle it
                ActionMapping actionMapping = new ActionMapping(new 
ServletDispatcherResult(requestPath));

                // Set the name to "" to ensure we skip some of the find 
requests for JSPs
                actionMapping.setName("");

                // Put the action mapping in the request where the 
PrepareFilter will find it
                servletRequest.setAttribute("struts.actionMapping", 
actionMapping);

                filterChain.doFilter(servletRequest, servletReponse);
        }

        public void init(FilterConfig filterConfig) throws ServletException {
                // do nothing
        }

}
{code}

By mapping this filter to the /dwr/* pattern, I seem to get what I want. All 
the functionality of Struts2 and all the functionality of DWR. While the core 
DWR functionality (remoting) was working fine before this filter, the handle 
information pages were not. This isn't a big deal except I was also using the 
DWR namespace in my Spring application context to map the classes. Without 
those information page I didn't have a good way to view that information.

Is there a better way to get the Struts2 filters to ignore requests? If not, 
then I think this issue can be closed, it's resolved from my end.

> DWR class information pages don't work with Struts2
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-2969
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2969
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.6
>         Environment: Jetty 6.1.14 on Windows XP Pro
> Struts2 2.1.6 with Convention plugin
> DWR 2.0.3
>            Reporter: Brian Curnow
>
> This may not be an actual bug and be "broken" this way be design. In reading 
> through the documentation (http://struts.apache.org/2.1.6/docs/webxml.html) 
> it's recommended that you map the Struts 
> FilterDispatcher/StrutsPrepareAndExecuteFilter to the URL pattern "/*". This 
> seems to work fine with what I'll call traditional Struts2 (i.e. no 
> Convention plugin) and also with the Convention plugin.
> I'm attempting to use DWR 2.0 and their documentation has you map the 
> dwr-invoker (I'm using the Spring version: 
> org.directwebremoting.spring.DwrSpringServlet) to the URL pattern "/dwr/*" 
> (http://directwebremoting.org/dwr/server/servlet). This works fine in 
> traditional Struts2 but breaks when using the Convention plugin.
> What I get  when I attempt to hit http://localhost:8080/dwr is an error: 
> "There is no Action mapped for namespace / and action name dwr." I can work 
> around that error by using http://localhost:8080/dwr/index.html however, when 
> clicking on a link on the DWR page (to see information about one of my 
> exposed classes) I get a similar error: "There is no Action mapped for 
> namespace /dwr/test and action name MessageBean."
> I believe this is caused because the Convention plugin treats URLs it can't 
> resolve as errors instead of falling back on the web container to handle 
> them. This doesn't seem to be an issue for URLs which actually map back to 
> files, for example, http://localhost:8080/styles/menu.css works just fine and 
> returns the menu.css file in my <web app root>/styles directory. Like I said 
> earlier, this may have been by design.
> I've worked around this two ways:
> 1. Resetting struts.action.extension to be simply "action", since none of the 
> DWR URLs using .action, this is working but now I have that darn .action in 
> my URLs again
> 2. Adding a package-info.java to my base Action package and setting a 
> namespace 
> (@org.apache.struts2.convention.annotation.Namespace(value="/action")) and 
> then changing the filter mapping in web.xml to only look for /action/* (and 
> moving the results files as well)
> Neither of those solutions is, in my opinion, very attractive and it seems 
> that if traditional struts2 can support the DWR URLs that the Convention 
> plugin should be able to support them too.
> Is this an actual bug and can it be fixed or is there another workaround?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to