[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14540047#comment-14540047
]
Josef Vermach commented on WW-4437:
-----------------------------------
Ok, thanks!
We tried to do ugrade but we are not able to start application. Caused by:
{noformat}
Exception starting filter struts2
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: VERSION_2_3_0
at
org.apache.struts2.views.freemarker.FreemarkerManager.createConfiguration(FreemarkerManager.java:331)
at
org.apache.struts2.views.freemarker.FreemarkerManager.init(FreemarkerManager.java:282)
at
org.apache.struts2.views.freemarker.FreemarkerManager.getConfiguration(FreemarkerManager.java:269)
at
org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.DefaultDispatcherErrorHandler.init(DefaultDispatcherErrorHandler.java:47)
at org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.Dispatcher.init(Dispatcher.java:488)
...
{noformat}
> Bug in CookieInterceptor
> ------------------------
>
> Key: WW-4437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4437
> Project: Struts 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core Interceptors
> Affects Versions: 2.3.20
> Reporter: Chris Pratt
> Assignee: Lukasz Lenart
> Fix For: 2.3.24
>
>
> Sorry, I don't have an environment set up to create a patch, but I found an
> error in the {{CookieInterceptor.isAccepted()}} method. It currently looks
> like:
> {code:java}
> /**
> * Checks if name of Cookie match {@link #acceptedPattern}
> *
> * @param name of Cookie
> * @return true|false
> */
> protected boolean isAccepted(String name) {
> boolean matches = acceptedPattern.matcher(name).matches();
> if (matches) {
> if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
> LOG.trace("Cookie [#0] matches acceptedPattern [#1]", name,
> ACCEPTED_PATTERN);
> }
> } else {
> if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
> LOG.trace("Cookie [#0] doesn't match acceptedPattern [#1]", name,
> ACCEPTED_PATTERN);
> }
> }
> return matches;
> }
> {code}
> But it would be more useful if it actually reported the RegEx being used
> instead of the default. And, it would be more performant if the comparisons
> were reversed. So something more like:
> {code:java}
> /**
> * Checks if name of Cookie match {@link #acceptedPattern}
> *
> * @param name of Cookie
> * @return true|false
> */
> protected boolean isAccepted (String name) {
> boolean matches = acceptedPattern.matcher(name).matches();
> if(LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
> if(matches) {
> LOG.trace("Cookie [#0] matches acceptedPattern
> [#1]",name,acceptedPattern.pattern());
> } else {
> LOG.trace("Cookie [#0] doesn't match acceptedPattern
> [#1]",name,acceptedPattern.pattern());
> }
> }
> return matches;
> }
> {code}
> In addition, it looks like the default and the override are handled
> differently. The current code compiles the default case-insensitive, but not
> the override pattern. Shouldn't that be consistent?
> {code:java}
> private Pattern acceptedPattern =
> Pattern.compile(ACCEPTED_PATTERN,Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE);
> public void setAcceptCookieNames (String pattern) {
> acceptedPattern = Pattern.compile(pattern);
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
