[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Brian Andle updated WW-5184:
----------------------------
    Description: 
It is known that developers utilizing Struts/Freemarker should always ensure 
proper sanitization to prevent OGNL/Freemarker evaluation on untrusted user 
input when %{/$\{ in FTL being passed into Struts tags.

These patterns aren't always practical to resolve/find especially in legacy 
code. This isn't a solely a legacy code issue of course, it's just as easy to 
make a mistake in newer code as well.

The following would end up rendering 81

Payload:
{code:java}
untrustedInput=%25%7B9%2A9%7D {code}
FTL:

 
{code:java}
<@s.form theme="simple" action="${untrustedInput}" id="myForm4">

</@s.form> {code}
 

Java:
{code:java}
    private String untrustedInput;
    public String getUntrustedInput() {
        return untrustedInput;
    }
    public void setUntrustedInput(String untrustedInput) {
        this.untrustedInput = untrustedInput;
    } {code}
 

This ticket is to add an optional `params.excludeValuePatterns` so that 
ParametersInterceptor can drop incoming parameter itself if the value matches a 
pattern to be excluded.

 
{code:java}
<param 
name="params.excludeValuePatterns">.*\$\{.*?\}.*,.*%\{.*?\}.*</param>{code}
 

Since this is a pattern and would be executed against the values themselves 
there is the potential of a performance impact however I since it's optional we 
shouldn't see any measurable impact when not enabled.

 

*NOTE:* I did add a `params.acceptValuePatterns` pattern that is null/disabled 
by default. This might not ever be used but mimic'd the Pattern matcher the 
ParametersInterceptor/CookieInterceptor.

 

  was:
It is known that developers utilizing Struts/Freemarker should always  ensure 
proper sanitization to prevent OGNL/Freemarker evaluation on untrusted user 
input when %{/$\{ in FTL being passed into Struts tags.

These patterns aren't always practical to resolve/find especially in legacy 
code. This isn't a solely a legacy code of course it's just as easy to make a 
mistake in newer code as well.

The following would end up rendering 81

Payload:
{code:java}
untrustedInput=%25%7B9%2A9%7D {code}
FTL:

 
{code:java}
<@s.form theme="simple" action="${untrustedInput}" id="myForm4">

</@s.form> {code}
 

Java:
{code:java}
    private String untrustedInput;
    public String getUntrustedInput() {
        return untrustedInput;
    }
    public void setUntrustedInput(String untrustedInput) {
        this.untrustedInput = untrustedInput;
    } {code}
 

This ticket is to add an optional `params.excludeValuePatterns` so that 
ParametersInterceptor can drop incoming parameter itself if the value matches a 
pattern to be excluded.

 
{code:java}
<param 
name="params.excludeValuePatterns">.*\$\{.*?\}.*,.*%\{.*?\}.*</param>{code}
 

Since this is a pattern and would be executed against the values themselves 
there is the potential of a performance impact however I since it's optional we 
shouldn't see any measurable impact when not enabled.

 

*NOTE:* I did add a `params.acceptValuePatterns` pattern that is null/disabled 
by default. This might not ever be used but mimic'd the Pattern matcher the 
ParametersInterceptor/CookieInterceptor.

 


> Add optional parameter value check to ParametersInterceptor
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-5184
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5184
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 6.0.0
>            Reporter: Brian Andle
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 6.1.0
>
>          Time Spent: 4.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> It is known that developers utilizing Struts/Freemarker should always ensure 
> proper sanitization to prevent OGNL/Freemarker evaluation on untrusted user 
> input when %{/$\{ in FTL being passed into Struts tags.
> These patterns aren't always practical to resolve/find especially in legacy 
> code. This isn't a solely a legacy code issue of course, it's just as easy to 
> make a mistake in newer code as well.
> The following would end up rendering 81
> Payload:
> {code:java}
> untrustedInput=%25%7B9%2A9%7D {code}
> FTL:
>  
> {code:java}
> <@s.form theme="simple" action="${untrustedInput}" id="myForm4">
> </@s.form> {code}
>  
> Java:
> {code:java}
>     private String untrustedInput;
>     public String getUntrustedInput() {
>         return untrustedInput;
>     }
>     public void setUntrustedInput(String untrustedInput) {
>         this.untrustedInput = untrustedInput;
>     } {code}
>  
> This ticket is to add an optional `params.excludeValuePatterns` so that 
> ParametersInterceptor can drop incoming parameter itself if the value matches 
> a pattern to be excluded.
>  
> {code:java}
> <param 
> name="params.excludeValuePatterns">.*\$\{.*?\}.*,.*%\{.*?\}.*</param>{code}
>  
> Since this is a pattern and would be executed against the values themselves 
> there is the potential of a performance impact however I since it's optional 
> we shouldn't see any measurable impact when not enabled.
>  
> *NOTE:* I did add a `params.acceptValuePatterns` pattern that is 
> null/disabled by default. This might not ever be used but mimic'd the Pattern 
> matcher the ParametersInterceptor/CookieInterceptor.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to