[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5355?focusedWorklogId=885012&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-885012
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on WW-5355:
--------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 13/Oct/23 11:08
Start Date: 13/Oct/23 11:08
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: kusalk opened a new pull request, #766:
URL: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/766
WW-5355
--
I see very limited advantage to using the default cache over the LRU one?
The eviction process is faster but at the cost of having to repopulate the
whole cache from scratch!
Keen to hear other thoughts or anything I may have missed
Perhaps in the future we can move to a more advanced algorithm such as the
ones provided by
[Caffeine](https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/wiki/Efficiency), although I'm
not sure how effective they'd be given the cache can be easily attacked.
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 885012)
Remaining Estimate: 0h
Time Spent: 10m
> Use LRU cache by default
> ------------------------
>
> Key: WW-5355
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5355
> Project: Struts 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Kusal Kithul-Godage
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 6.4.0
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
