[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5535?focusedWorklogId=1006591&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-1006591
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on WW-5535:
--------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 22/Feb/26 16:26
            Start Date: 22/Feb/26 16:26
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: lukaszlenart opened a new pull request, #1593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1593

   ## Summary
   
   - Fix `DefaultActionProxy.resolveMethod()` to only set 
`methodSpecified=false` when truly defaulting to `"execute"`, not when the 
method is resolved from action config (including wildcard substitution like 
`method="{1}"`)
   - This ensures `HttpMethodInterceptor` checks method-level 
`@HttpPost`/`@HttpGet` annotations for wildcard-resolved actions
   - Backport of PR #1592 to the 6.8.x branch
   
   ## Test plan
   
   - [x] `DefaultActionProxyTest` — 4 new tests covering explicit method, 
config-resolved method, execute default, and wildcard resolution
   - [x] `HttpMethodInterceptorTest` — 2 new tests verifying wildcard-resolved 
methods respect `@HttpPost` annotations
   - [x] `XmlConfigurationProviderAllowedMethodsTest` — updated assertion for 3 
new action configs
   - [ ] Full CI passes
   
   🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 1006591)
    Time Spent: 40m  (was: 0.5h)

> HttpMethodInterceptor does not work with action names using wildcards
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-5535
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5535
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Interceptors
>    Affects Versions: 6.7.0, 7.0.0
>            Reporter: Riccardo Proserpio
>            Assignee: Lukasz Lenart
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 6.9.0, 7.2.0
>
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The ActionProxy.isMethodSpecified() method is documented as:
> {noformat}
> Gets status of the method value's initialization.
> Returns: true if the method returned by getMethod() is not a default 
> initializer value.
> {noformat}
> However, the implementation in DefaultActionProxy has a different behavior:
>  
> {code:java}
> private void resolveMethod() {
>     // if the method is set to null, use the one from the configuration
>     // if the one from the configuration is also null, use "execute"
>     if (StringUtils.isEmpty(this.method)) {
>         this.method = config.getMethodName();
>         if (StringUtils.isEmpty(this.method)) {
>             this.method = ActionConfig.DEFAULT_METHOD;
>         }
>         methodSpecified = false;
>     }
> } {code}
> methodSpecified is set to false not only if the default value is used, but 
> also \{*}if methodName is specified via config{*}.
> This method seems to have been introduced long ago as a patch for some DMI 
> behavior regression: WW-3628
> The issue happens for example if you specify an action like
> {code:java}
> <action name="example-*" class="aClass" method="aMethod"/>
> {code}
> since the method value is resolved later by wildcard matching.
> The HttpMethodInterceptor uses isSpecifiedMethods to decide when to process 
> the invocation:
>  
> {code:java}
> if (invocation.getProxy().isMethodSpecified()) {
>     Method method = 
> action.getClass().getMethod(invocation.getProxy().getMethod()); 
>     // doIntercept...
> }{code}
> thus skipping the validation for actionNames with wildcards.
> I'm not really sure if isMethodSpecified is wrong or has misleading 
> documentation. I'm not even sure why the HttpMethodInterceptor should skip 
> validation on the default execute methods.
> A fix might be just assessing the existence of 
> invocation.getProxy().getMethod() instead on relying on isMethodSpecified, 
> but before submitting a pr I'd like the opinion on the maintainers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to