[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14142710#comment-14142710
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1055:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user hyunsik opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/152

    TAJO-1055: ExecutorPreCompiler does not cache correctly compiled 
TupleComparators.

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/hyunsik/tajo TAJO-1055

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/152.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #152
    
----
commit 76b4f890f259c1a68150438aba491105f977f62d
Author: Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>
Date:   2014-09-19T21:16:52Z

    TAJO-1055: ExecutorPreCompiler does not cache correctly compiled 
TupleComparators.

commit 081a8af5bab6ec3f6927b8439d591eb4e971df31
Author: Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>
Date:   2014-09-21T21:07:23Z

    Merge branch 'block_iteration' of 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tajo into TAJO-1055

----


> ExecutorPreCompiler does not cache correctly compiled TupleComparators.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1055
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1055
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Hyunsik Choi
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: block_iteration
>             Fix For: block_iteration
>
>
> ExecutorPreCompiler compiles and caches TupleComparator in CompilationContext 
> for sort operations. But, the current implementation misuses hash key, so it 
> tries to compile TupleComparator for each sort operation. As a result, it 
> causes concurrency problems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to