[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14630837#comment-14630837
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1397:
--------------------------------------

Github user jihoonson commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/608#discussion_r34864494
  
    --- Diff: 
tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/master/scheduler/AbstractQueryScheduler.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.tajo.master.scheduler;
    +
    +import org.apache.hadoop.service.AbstractService;
    +import org.apache.tajo.QueryId;
    +import org.apache.tajo.resource.NodeResource;
    +import org.apache.tajo.resource.NodeResources;
    +import org.apache.tajo.resource.ResourceCalculator;
    +
    +public abstract class AbstractQueryScheduler extends AbstractService 
implements TajoResourceScheduler {
    --- End diff --
    
    I know that there are detailed comments at TajoResourceScheduler interface. 
    So, please add a simple comment such as ```please refer to 
TajoResourceScheduler for detailed information```.


> Resource allocation should be fine grained.
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1397
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1397
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: QueryMaster, resource manager, Worker
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Jinho Kim
>             Fix For: 0.11.0
>
>         Attachments: ResoruceSequence.jpg, TAJO-1397.patch, 
> TAJO-1397_2.patch, old_resource_circuit.png, resource_circuit.png
>
>
> See the comment:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-540?focusedCommentId=14359478&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14359478
> From the discussion in TAJO-540
> {quote}
> In general, query (or job) scheduler aims at the maximum resource 
> utilization. For multi-tenancy, we also need to consider the fairness for 
> multiple users (or queries). BTW, the maximum resource utilization and 
> fairness are usually conflict to each other in many cases. To mitigate this 
> problem, many scheduler seems to use preemption approach.
> In this point, our resource and scheduler system has the following problems:
>  * A query exclusively uses allocated resources at the first time until the 
> query is completed or failed.
>  * There is no mechanism to deallocate resources during query processing.
>  * Preempt is also not allowed.
> To achieve the multi tenancy, we should change our resource circulation. 
> Especially, resource allocation must be fine grained instead of per query.
> So, I'll create a jira issue to change the resource circulation. We have to 
> do this issue firstly in my opinion. If we achieve this, implementing 
> multi-tenant scheduler would be much easier than now. It would be a good 
> starting point of this issue.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to