[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13914203#comment-13914203
]
Tajo QA commented on TAJO-640:
------------------------------
{color:red}*-1 overall.*{color} Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12631477/TAJO-640.patch
against master revision 0371803.
{color:green}+1 @author.{color} The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included.{color} The patch appears to include 3 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac.{color} The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc.{color} The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javadoc warnings.
{color:green}+1 checkstyle.{color} The patch generated 0 code style errors.
{color:red}-1 findbugs.{color} The patch appears to introduce 178 new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit.{color} The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests.{color} The patch passed unit tests in
tajo-core/tajo-core-backend.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TAJO-Build/168//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TAJO-Build/168//artifact/incubator-tajo/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningstajo-core-backend.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TAJO-Build/168//console
This message is automatically generated.
> In inner join clause, empty table can cause a error by order-by clause.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-640
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-640
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: distributed query plan
> Affects Versions: 0.8-incubating, 1.0-incubating
> Reporter: Jaehwa Jung
> Assignee: Jaehwa Jung
> Fix For: 0.8-incubating, 1.0-incubating
>
> Attachments: TAJO-640.patch
>
>
> In inner join clause, empty table can cause a error by order-by clause as
> follows:
> {code:xml}
> * SQL
> select a.id from table1 a, table3 b where a.id = b.id order by a.id;
> * Error
> 4-02-27 16:01:21,118 INFO querymaster.SubQuery
> (SubQuery.java:initTaskScheduler(611)) -
> org.apache.tajo.master.DefaultTaskScheduler is chosen for the task scheduling
> 2014-02-27 16:01:21,119 INFO querymaster.SubQuery
> (SubQuery.java:getNonLeafTaskNum(748)) - Table's volume is approximately 0 MB
> 2014-02-27 16:01:21,119 INFO querymaster.SubQuery
> (SubQuery.java:getNonLeafTaskNum(751)) - The determined number of non-leaf
> tasks is 1
> 2014-02-27 16:01:21,121 ERROR querymaster.SubQuery
> (SubQuery.java:transition(595)) - SubQuery (eb_1393484173390_0002_000004)
> ERROR:
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: ERROR: Invalid Column Stats (column stats:
> [], there exists not target a.id (INT4)
> at
> com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkState(Preconditions.java:150)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.engine.utils.TupleUtil.columnStatToRange(TupleUtil.java:79)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.Repartitioner.scheduleRangeShuffledFetches(Repartitioner.java:332)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.Repartitioner.scheduleFragmentsForNonLeafTasks(Repartitioner.java:300)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.SubQuery$InitAndRequestContainer.schedule(SubQuery.java:733)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.SubQuery$InitAndRequestContainer.transition(SubQuery.java:579)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.SubQuery$InitAndRequestContainer.transition(SubQuery.java:560)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.state.StateMachineFactory$MultipleInternalArc.doTransition(StateMachineFactory.java:385)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.state.StateMachineFactory.doTransition(StateMachineFactory.java:302)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.state.StateMachineFactory.access$300(StateMachineFactory.java:46)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.state.StateMachineFactory$InternalStateMachine.doTransition(StateMachineFactory.java:448)
> at org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.SubQuery.handle(SubQuery.java:537)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.Query$SubQueryCompletedTransition.executeNextBlock(Query.java:560)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.Query$SubQueryCompletedTransition.transition(Query.java:593)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.Query$SubQueryCompletedTransition.transition(Query.java:546)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.state.StateMachineFactory$SingleInternalArc.doTransition(StateMachineFactory.java:362)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.state.StateMachineFactory.doTransition(StateMachineFactory.java:302)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.state.StateMachineFactory.access$300(StateMachineFactory.java:46)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.state.StateMachineFactory$InternalStateMachine.doTransition(StateMachineFactory.java:448)
> at org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.Query.handle(Query.java:646)
> at org.apache.tajo.master.querymaster.Query.handle(Query.java:58)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.TajoAsyncDispatcher.dispatch(TajoAsyncDispatcher.java:137)
> at
> org.apache.tajo.master.TajoAsyncDispatcher$1.run(TajoAsyncDispatcher.java:79)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
