[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14490455#comment-14490455
 ] 

Cyrille Chépélov edited comment on TEZ-2237 at 4/10/15 10:17 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Just to make sure I'm following everything, what happens if one of the inputs 
end up being empty (for any reason, such as one of the intermediate inputs is 
the result of a {code}val p2 = p1.filter(_ == false){code} operation. Would 
that fall within the situation the patch handles? 

Sounds like good news [~sseth]. Hopefully a tez-0.6.1 release can be planned 
soon after next week.




was (Author: cchepelov):
Just to make sure I'm following everything, what happens if one of the inputs 
end up being empty (for any reason, such as one of the intermediate inputs is 
the result of a {code}.filter(_ == false){code} operation. Would that fall 
within the situation the patch handles? 

Sound like good news [~sseth]. Hopefully a tez-0.6.1 release can be planned 
soon after next week.



> Complex DAG freezes and fails (was BufferTooSmallException raised in 
> UnorderedPartitionedKVWriter then DAG lingers)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-2237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2237
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.0
>         Environment: Debian Linux "jessie"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_40-internal-b27)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.40-b25, mixed mode)
> 7 * Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 16/24 GB RAM per node, 1*system 
> disk + 4*1 or 2 TiB HDD for HDFS & local  (on-prem, dedicated hardware)
> Scalding 0.13.1 modified with https://github.com/twitter/scalding/pull/1220 
> to run Cascading 3.0.0-wip-90 with TEZ 0.6.0
>            Reporter: Cyrille Chépélov
>         Attachments: TEZ-2237-hack.branch6.txt, TEZ-2237-hack.master.txt, 
> TEZ-2237.test.2_branch0.6.txt, all_stacks.lst, alloc_mem.png, 
> alloc_vcores.png, application_1427324000018_1444.yarn-logs.red.txt.gz, 
> application_1427324000018_1908.red.txt.bz2, 
> application_1427964335235_2070.txt.red.txt.bz2, 
> appmaster____syslog_dag_1427282048097_0215_1.red.txt.gz, 
> appmaster____syslog_dag_1427282048097_0237_1.red.txt.gz, 
> gc_count_MRAppMaster.png, mem_free.png, noopexample_2237.txt, 
> oneOutOfTwoOutputsStarted.txt, ordered-grouped-kv-input-traces.diff, 
> output-starts.txt, start_containers.png, stop_containers.png, 
> syslog_attempt_1427282048097_0215_1_21_000014_0.red.txt.gz, 
> syslog_attempt_1427282048097_0237_1_70_000028_0.red.txt.gz, yarn_rm_flips.png
>
>
> On a specific DAG with many vertices (actually part of a larger meta-DAG), 
> after about a hour of processing, several BufferTooSmallException are raised 
> in UnorderedPartitionedKVWriter (about one every two or three spills).
> Once these exceptions are raised, the DAG remains indefinitely "active", 
> tying up memory and CPU resources as far as YARN is concerned, while little 
> if any actual processing takes place. 
> It seems two separate issues are at hand:
>   1. BufferTooSmallException are raised even though, small as the actually 
> allocated buffers seem to be (around a couple megabytes were allotted whereas 
> 100MiB were requested), the actual keys and values are never bigger than 24 
> and 1024 bytes respectively.
>   2. In the event BufferTooSmallExceptions are raised, the DAG fails to stop 
> (stop requests appear to be sent 7 hours after the BTSE exceptions are 
> raised, but 9 hours after these stop requests, the DAG was still lingering on 
> with all containers present tying up memory and CPU allocations)
> The emergence of the BTSE prevent the Cascade to complete, preventing from 
> validating the results compared to traditional MR1-based results. The lack of 
> conclusion renders the cluster queue unavailable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to