[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14615866#comment-14615866
 ] 

Bikas Saha commented on TEZ-2496:
---------------------------------

Yes. That is what I am suggesting because I think going the full fledged 
partition route is risky in its current form. Not sure if you disagree with 
that risk assessment. The other features mentioned would need new information 
to be passed to the reducer inputs right? That could be done via new events 
sent from shufflevertexmanager to the tasks (eg. input data information event 
being used to send splits today).

> Consider scheduling tasks in ShuffleVertexManager based on the partition 
> sizes from the source
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-2496
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2496
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Rajesh Balamohan
>            Assignee: Rajesh Balamohan
>         Attachments: TEZ-2496.1.patch, TEZ-2496.2.patch, TEZ-2496.3.patch, 
> TEZ-2496.4.patch, TEZ-2496.5.patch, TEZ-2496.6.patch
>
>
> Consider scheduling tasks in ShuffleVertexManager based on the partition 
> sizes from the source.  This would be helpful in scenarios, where there is 
> limited resources (or concurrent jobs running or multiple waves) with 
> dataskew and the task which gets large amount of data gets sceheduled much 
> later.
> e.g Consider the following hive query running in a queue with limited 
> capacity (42 slots in total) @ 200 GB scale
> {noformat}
> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE sampleData AS
>   SELECT CASE
>            WHEN ss_sold_time_sk IS NULL THEN 70429
>            ELSE ss_sold_time_sk
>        END AS ss_sold_time_sk,
>        ss_item_sk,
>        ss_customer_sk,
>        ss_cdemo_sk,
>        ss_hdemo_sk,
>        ss_addr_sk,
>        ss_store_sk,
>        ss_promo_sk,
>        ss_ticket_number,
>        ss_quantity,
>        ss_wholesale_cost,
>        ss_list_price,
>        ss_sales_price,
>        ss_ext_discount_amt,
>        ss_ext_sales_price,
>        ss_ext_wholesale_cost,
>        ss_ext_list_price,
>        ss_ext_tax,
>        ss_coupon_amt,
>        ss_net_paid,
>        ss_net_paid_inc_tax,
>        ss_net_profit,
>        ss_sold_date_sk
>   FROM store_sales distribute by ss_sold_time_sk;
> {noformat}
> This generated 39 maps and 134 reduce slots (3 reduce waves). When lots of 
> nulls are there for ss_sold_time_sk, it would tend to have data skew towards 
> 70429.  If the reducer which gets this data gets scheduled much earlier (i.e 
> in first wave itself), entire job would finish fast.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to