[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14903634#comment-14903634
 ] 

TezQA commented on TEZ-2851:
----------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12761735/TEZ-2851.1.patch
  against master revision 81a1221.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified test files.

      {color:red}-1 javac{color}.  The applied patch generated 142 javac 
compiler warnings (more than the master's current 140 warnings).

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in :
                   
org.apache.tez.dag.history.logging.ats.TestHistoryEventTimelineConversion

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1167//testReport/
Javac warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1167//artifact/patchprocess/diffJavacWarnings.txt
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1167//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Support a way for upstream applications to pass in a caller context to Tez
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-2851
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2851
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hitesh Shah
>            Assignee: Hitesh Shah
>         Attachments: TEZ-2851.1.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to