[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15157878#comment-15157878
 ] 

TezQA commented on TEZ-3126:
----------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12789063/TEZ-3126.2.patch
  against master revision f38e23c.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in :
                   org.apache.tez.test.TestFaultTolerance

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1497//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1497//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Log reason for not reducing parallelism
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-3126
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3126
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jonathan Eagles
>            Assignee: Jonathan Eagles
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: TEZ-3126.1.patch, TEZ-3126.2.patch
>
>
> For example, when reducing parallelism from 36 to 22. The basePartitionRange 
> will be 1 and will not re-configure the vertex.
> {code:java|title=ShuffleVertexManager#determineParallelismAndApply|borderStyle=dashed|bgColor=lightgrey}
>     int desiredTaskParallelism = 
>         (int)(
>             (expectedTotalSourceTasksOutputSize+desiredTaskInputDataSize-1)/
>             desiredTaskInputDataSize);
>     if(desiredTaskParallelism < minTaskParallelism) {
>       desiredTaskParallelism = minTaskParallelism;
>     }
>     
>     if(desiredTaskParallelism >= currentParallelism) {
>       return true;
>     }
>     
>     // most shufflers will be assigned this range
>     basePartitionRange = currentParallelism/desiredTaskParallelism;
>     
>     if (basePartitionRange <= 1) {
>       // nothing to do if range is equal 1 partition. shuffler does it by 
> default
>       return true;
>     }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to