[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15310154#comment-15310154
 ] 

TezQA commented on TEZ-3285:
----------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12807398/TEZ-3285.2.patch
  against master revision de8b460.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 javac{color:red}.  The patch appears to cause the build to 
fail.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1764//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Tez UI: Lock down dependency versions using npm-shrinkwrap
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-3285
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3285
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sreenath Somarajapuram
>            Assignee: Sreenath Somarajapuram
>         Attachments: TEZ-3285.1.patch, TEZ-3285.2.patch
>
>
> All dependencies of tez-ui is having fixed versions. But the dependencies of 
> our dependencies are not. Hence a level down in the dependency tree, the 
> build might be looking for the latest packages. This affects the reliability 
> of the UI build.
> NPM:
> npm shrinkwrap create a separate json from the currently installed packages, 
> and ensure that the complete dependency tree is intact across all the build.
> Bower:
> Bower doesn't have a hierarchy and this issue can be avoided by locking on a 
> specific version for all dependent package in the bower.json itself.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to