[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15392422#comment-15392422
 ] 

Hitesh Shah commented on TEZ-3359:
----------------------------------

Comments: 

{code}
 // Copy historyLogLevel from tezConf into dagConf if its not overridden in 
dagConf.
1053        String logLevel = 
this.dagConf.get(TezConfiguration.TEZ_HISTORY_LOGLEVEL);
1054        if (logLevel == null) {
1055          logLevel = tezConf.get(TezConfiguration.TEZ_HISTORY_LOGLEVEL);
1056        }
                    if (logLevel != null) {
1058          if (!HistoryLogLevel.validateLogLevel(logLevel)) {
1059            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Config: " + 
TezConfiguration.TEZ_HISTORY_LOGLEVEL +
1060                " is set to invalid value: " + logLevel);
1061          }
1062          PlanKeyValuePair.Builder kvp = PlanKeyValuePair.newBuilder();
1063          kvp.setKey(TezConfiguration.TEZ_HISTORY_LOGLEVEL);
1064          kvp.setValue(tezConf.get(TezConfiguration.TEZ_HISTORY_LOGLEVEL));
1065          confProtoBuilder.addConfKeyValues(kvp);
1066        }
{code}
  - why is the AM log level overriding the dag conf provided level?  line 1064? 
  - Please enhance unit tests to catch this bug.

Patch 05 seems incomplete.  



> Add granular log levels for HistoryLoggingService.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-3359
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3359
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Harish Jaiprakash
>            Assignee: Harish Jaiprakash
>         Attachments: TEZ-3359.01.patch, TEZ-3359.02.patch, TEZ-3359.03.patch, 
> TEZ-3359.04.patch, TEZ-3359.05.patch
>
>
> We publish too many events to ATS, this increases the file size for ATS. 
> Reduce data size logged into ATS by:
> * Having a more granular control over the loglevel, disable task level logs, 
> or all logs and so on.
> * Disable logging counters.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to