[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988306#comment-15988306
 ] 

TezQA commented on TEZ-3673:
----------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12865463/TEZ-3673.04.patch
  against master revision 247719d.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/2402//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/2402//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Allocate smaller buffers in UnorderedPartitionedKVWriter
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-3673
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3673
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Harish Jaiprakash
>            Assignee: Harish Jaiprakash
>         Attachments: TEZ-3673.01.patch, TEZ-3673.02.patch, TEZ-3673.03.patch, 
> TEZ-3673.04.patch
>
>
> UnorderedPartitionedKVWriter allocates in bigger chunks. It may or may not 
> get filled up. In PipelinedSorter, we start off with 32MB chunks. But 
> UnorderedPartitionedKVWriter can be worse as it allocates bigger blocks. Need 
> to revisit this allocation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to