[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13876366#comment-13876366 ]
Bryan Call commented on TS-1007: -------------------------------- [~n...@webthing.com] I don't think you can depend on the transaction being closed before the session. It sounds like the pointers in the transaction should be cleaned up if the session goes away. Can you please update the bug? > SSN Close called before TXN Close > --------------------------------- > > Key: TS-1007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1007 > Project: Traffic Server > Issue Type: Bug > Components: TS API > Affects Versions: 3.0.1 > Reporter: Nick Kew > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 6.0.0 > > > Where a plugin implements both SSN_CLOSE_HOOK and TXN_CLOSE_HOOK, the > SSN_CLOSE_HOOK is called first of the two. This messes up normal cleanups! > Details: > Register a SSN_START event globally > In the SSN START, add a TXN_START and a SSN_CLOSE > In the TXN START, add a TXN_CLOSE > Stepping through, I see the order of events actually called, for the simple > case of a one-off HTTP request with no keepalive: > SSN_START > TXN_START > SSN_END > TXN_END > Whoops, SSN_END cleaned up the SSN context, leaving dangling pointers in the > TXN! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)