[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14171168#comment-14171168
 ] 

Sudheer Vinukonda edited comment on TS-3133 at 10/14/14 4:42 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

So, the proposed log would be something like this (print this 1 in every "n" 
times, where "n" is displayed in the log (for example: if n = 1000)


{code}
NOTE: Skipping the current log entry for squid.blog because its size (11000) 
exceeds the maximum payload space in a log buffer (log repeated 1000 times).
{code}


was (Author: sudheerv):
So, the proposed log would be something like this (print this 1 in every "n" 
times, where "n" is displayed in the log (for example: if n = 1000)


{code}
NOTE: Skipping the current log entry for squid.blog because its size (11000) 
exceeds the maximum payload space in a log buffer (log skipped 1000 times).
{code}

> Logging NOTE filling up diags.log
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-3133
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3133
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Logging
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.1
>            Reporter: Sudheer Vinukonda
>            Assignee: Sudheer Vinukonda
>             Fix For: 5.2.0
>
>
> In our production systems, we have proxy.config.log.log_buffer_size set to 
> the default value of 9216. However, we do see some very large URLs resulting 
> in larger log entries (about 26k bytes long). This basically results in  the 
> warnings like the below from ATS (going into diags.log). This is good, but, 
> the problem is that, these WARNING messages alone fill up/flood the diags.log 
> pretty fast (which itself is not rotated right now). The correct solution to 
> this is to increase the log buffers, which we are implementing, but, it might 
> be nice to not flood the diags.log with the below WARNINGs as that might 
> result in losing/missing out on other critical/important WARNINGs. We are 
> thinking of implementing some sort of throttling on these kind of WARNINGs 
> (for e.g. 1 in every 1000 entries along with a count of how many times the 
> log was not displayed). 
> Please provide comments/suggestions.
> {code}
> [Oct 10 18:04:13.300] Server {0x2ad39283f700} NOTE: Skipping the current log
> entry for squid.blog because its size (11000) exceeds the maximum payload 
> space
> in a log buffer
> [Oct 10 19:13:53.190] Server {0x2b1ccec45700} NOTE: Traffic Server is skipping
> the current log entry because its size exceeds the maximum line (entry) size
> for an ascii log buffer
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to