[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4658?focusedWorklogId=28257&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-28257
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on TS-4658:
--------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 07/Sep/16 03:05
            Start Date: 07/Sep/16 03:05
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: GitHub user shinrich opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/976

    TS-4658: Why is TSSslVConnOp API?

    Pulled TSSslVConnOp from plugin header file and docs.  Added it back in 
internally.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/shinrich/trafficserver ts-4658

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/976.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #976
    
----
commit f560d00dd207ec50774df7ba5627c3b1e515f59d
Author: Susan Hinrichs <shinr...@ieee.org>
Date:   2016-09-07T03:03:37Z

    TS-4658: Why is TSSslVConnOp API?

----


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

            Worklog Id:     (was: 28257)
            Time Spent: 10m
    Remaining Estimate: 0h

> Why is TSSslVConnOp API?
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-4658
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4658
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SSL, TS API
>            Reporter: James Peach
>            Assignee: Susan Hinrichs
>              Labels: incompatible
>             Fix For: 7.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> {{TSSslVConnOp}} is not used in any APIs; it is basically an internal flag to 
> determine whether the core should terminate a TLS session or not. Let's 
> remove it from API and make it internal to {{SSLNetVConnection}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to