[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17338280#comment-17338280
 ] 

Ravi Kishore Valeti edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-4235 at 5/3/21, 9:36 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

[~dbwong], I am picking this up. Can some one please assign this to me?. I 
can't change the assignee.


was (Author: rvaleti):
[~dbwong], I am picking this up. Can some assign this to me?. I can't change 
the assignee.

> Java Client SendThread does not clean up created objects during constructor 
> of SaslClient and Login
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-4235
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4235
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java client
>            Reporter: Daniel Wong
>            Priority: Major
>
> Hi I am an Apache Phoenix committer and I help manage many many zookeeper 
> clusters at my employment primarily using ZK for HBase use cases.  We 
> recently had a production incident where some of our ACLs were not setup 
> preventing connectivity from the client to the ZK nodes and the failure path 
> exposed 2 issues to fix. This Jira and 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4236 .  This Jira is the more 
> important of the 2 and handles the failure observed in that we had a 
> FD/thread leak from the ZK java client send thread.  We had hundreds of 
> threads per JVM with the following stack trace.
> {code:java}
> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at 
> java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/Native Method) 
> at 
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:399)
>  - locked <0x00000015004fde20> (a java.net.SocksSocketImpl) at 
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:242)
>  at 
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:224)
>  at 
> java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/SocksSocketImpl.java:403)
>  at java.net.Socket.connect(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/Socket.java:609) at 
> sun.security.krb5.internal.TCPClient.<init>(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/NetClient.java:62)
>  at 
> sun.security.krb5.internal.NetClient.getInstance(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/NetClient.java:42)
>  at 
> sun.security.krb5.KdcComm$KdcCommunication.run(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/KdcComm.java:401)
>  at 
> sun.security.krb5.KdcComm$KdcCommunication.run(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/KdcComm.java:364)
>  at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/Native 
> Method) at 
> sun.security.krb5.KdcComm.send(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/KdcComm.java:348)
>  at 
> sun.security.krb5.KdcComm.sendIfPossible(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/KdcComm.java:253)
>  at 
> sun.security.krb5.KdcComm.send(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/KdcComm.java:234)
>  at 
> sun.security.krb5.KdcComm.send(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/KdcComm.java:200)
>  at 
> sun.security.krb5.KrbAsReqBuilder.send(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/KrbAsReqBuilder.java:326)
>  at 
> sun.security.krb5.KrbAsReqBuilder.action(java.security.jgss@11.0.4.0.101/KrbAsReqBuilder.java:371)
>  at 
> com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule.attemptAuthentication(jdk.security.auth@11.0.4.0.101/Krb5LoginModule.java:754)
>  at 
> com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule.login(jdk.security.auth@11.0.4.0.101/Krb5LoginModule.java:592)
>  at 
> javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.invoke(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/LoginContext.java:726)
>  at 
> javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext$4.run(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/LoginContext.java:665)
>  at 
> javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext$4.run(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/LoginContext.java:663)
>  at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/Native 
> Method) at 
> javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.invokePriv(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/LoginContext.java:663)
>  at 
> javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.login(java.base@11.0.4.0.101/LoginContext.java:574)
>  at org.apache.zookeeper.Login.login(Login.java:304) - locked 
> <0x000000151c477148> (a org.apache.zookeeper.Login) at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.Login.<init>(Login.java:106) at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.client.ZooKeeperSaslClient.createSaslClient(ZooKeeperSaslClient.java:249)
>  - locked <0x000000151c476f68> (a 
> org.apache.zookeeper.client.ZooKeeperSaslClient) at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.client.ZooKeeperSaslClient.<init>(ZooKeeperSaslClient.java:141)
>  at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.startConnect(ClientCnxn.java:972) 
> at org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:1031)
> {code}
> Note that today ZooKeeperSaslClient as well as Login both allocate resources 
> in their constructors and thus cannot be cleaned up or interrupted via 
> close/shutdown/disconnect of their parents due to still being a null object 
> during initialization.  This leaves the thread/sockets at the mercy of the 
> configured kdc retry/timeout configuration.
> This Jira is intended to break the constructor and the initialization path 
> into separate methods and properly clean up the resulting objects.
>   



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to