hi, On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 09:26:37PM +0000, Ignas Anikevičius wrote: > Are there any plans for support of the IDLE and PUSH extensions in > mbsync? > IDLE is being considered; it depends on the "daemon mode" item in the TODO list. there was a related thread on the list some months ago.
PUSH seems to be vaporware for all i can tell. at it happens, today i read the RFCs for CONDSTORE and QRESYNC (which are actually implemented by gmail and certainly some others). with these extensions, polling is actually quite cheap, so that may be a viable alternative to IDLE. > am ready to help with it if there is an agreement, that it would be > beneficial to have the above functionality. > please familiarize yourself with the code a bit. when you have a basic grasp of the structure, you'll understand the challenge. we can discuss possible solutions at that point. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
