On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:12:29PM +0800, Casper Ti. Vector wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:45:52AM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > maybe mail me the output of a run with -Dn for a closer look. > > Done in private mail. > > > the 1e9 was just chosen to make the query string legible. sending the > > INT_MAX verbatim would be more correct. > > Looked at the IMAP spec just now; it seems that UIDs are supposed to be > 32-bit unsigned integers. Perhaps we should use `uint32_t' (or > something equivalent) for the internal representation of UIDs, > yes
> and send `UINT32_MAX'? > won't work, because this will break servers which use signed ints (probably the majority). i already started working on a solution which doesn't send an arbitrary "maximal" uid at all. i hope to finish it one of the next weekends ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
