Tony Stevens wrote: > This gives me all the ammunition I need - thanks! That was the main reason for the changes I made. I talked with a vendor of a commercial PDF solution lately. His product wasn't as feature rich as iText, but he had a fancy 'feature' list.
As Paulo says: there's very little to be gained from the change I made. I've benchmarked it with some test samples and both the win in speed or size was ignorable. However: I like the change because we can finally get rid of Document.compress in one of the future iText versions (maybe 3.0). br, Bruno ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Do you like iText? Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php Or leave a tip: https://tipit.to/itexttipjar
