Valentin, mkl wrote > I'll look into the example file later.
I just compared the CMS containers, and the only differences are 1. The old container has an encapsulated content, the new one has not. 2. The old one has no signed attributes, the new one has ContentType, SigningTime, MessageDigest, and RevocationInfoArchival. 3. The signatureValues differ. 4. The signatureTimestamp SigningTimes and hashes differ Item 1. is due to the changed subfilter Item 2. became necessary to include signing time and revocation information. Signing time is not strictly necessary here as a time stamp is present. Item 3. is due to the presence of signed attributes, see item 2, and the changed subfilter. Item 4. is due to the different times of signing. I would start by trying without the revocation information first. Regards, Michael -- View this message in context: http://itext-general.2136553.n4.nabble.com/Green-check-mark-issue-tp4658502p4658511.html Sent from the iText - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions iText(R) is a registered trademark of 1T3XT BVBA. Many questions posted to this list can (and will) be answered with a reference to the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/ Please check the keywords list before you ask for examples: http://itextpdf.com/themes/keywords.php
