Hummmm I have to investigate.

Best,
Scuri
Em 15/01/2016 23:02, "Eric Wing" <[email protected]> escreveu:

> On 1/15/16, Eric Wing <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 1/15/16, Antonio Scuri <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>   In iupgtk_button.c, try adding pixels to the border estimation:
> >>
> >> void iupdrvButtonAddBorders(int *x, int *y)
> >> {
> >>   /* LAYOUT_DECORATION_ESTIMATE */
> >> #ifdef WIN32
> >>   int border_size = 2*5;
> >> #else
> >> #ifdef HILDON
> >>   int border_size = 2*7+1; /* borders are not symmetric */
> >> #else
> >>   int border_size = 2*5+1; /* borders are not symmetric */
> >> #endif
> >> #endif
> >>   (*x) += border_size;
> >>   (*y) += border_size;
> >> }
> >>
> >>   Ultimately we will need an ifdef for Raspbian.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Scuri
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Antonio Scuri <
> [email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>   Ok Thanks. I think we can easily fix that. Just give me a couple of
> >>> days.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Scuri
> >
> >
> > I (arbitrarily) changed it to
> > int border_size = 2*15+1;
> >
> > It looks better:
> >
> http://playcontrol.net/tempdownload/iup_screens_pi/iup_gtk3_sample_border15.png
> >
> > I also just tested Debian Jessie (amd64). It seems to have the same
> > problem as Raspbian Jessie. So I think this is a general problem, and
> > not Pi specific.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eric
> >
>
> I should point out that the padding also made the buttons much taller
> with too much padding vertically.
>
>
> A quick digression since I got Debian Jessie (amd64) running...I've
> been trying to reproduce that initial screwed up size at launch where
> I can't see the view. I haven't reproduced it exactly, but on rare
> occasions, I've seen the view be too small for the window (instead of
> too big). It happens much less frequently than on the Pi. This is
> speculation, but I can't help wonder if there is some kind of race
> condition, maybe between when a widget actually gets created and has
> legitimate values, between an Iup call and the underlying system.
> Since Pi is slower, maybe the condition hits more often.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Iup-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Iup-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users

Reply via email to