Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Sunday 22 July 2007 13:20:19 Axel Thimm wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:05:19AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>> Try the latest code from the subversion trunk
>>>> (http://ivtvdriver.org/viewcvs/ivtv/trunk.tar.gz?view=tar). I've
>>>> removed the ivtv driver itself from that code so it only contains
>>>> the utilities, ivtv-fb and the saa717x module. This should be used
>>>> for 2.6.22 and up.
>>> Which is the authoritative driver code (in development, not the
>>> in-kernel) now, v4l-dvb?
>> The authoritative ivtv driver code is v4l-dvb. For ivtv-fb and the
>> saa717x module (for Japanese cards) it is still the svn ivtv trunk
>> repository. I thought about keeping it in svn trunk as well, but I'm
>> happy with the way v4l-dvb works and Mauro (the v4l-dvb lead) merges my
>> changes pretty quickly. So rather then having to keep two trees in sync
>> I decided to develop in v4l-dvb.
>>
>> I hope to get ivtv-fb into 2.6.23 (no guarantees) and in that case
>> ivtv-fb will also be moved to v4l-dvb.
>>
>> A tree including ivtv-fb is already available here:
>>
>> http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/ivtv-fb
>>
>> Note that for kernels >= 2.6.18 and <= 2.6.21 the ivtv-0.10 branch will
>> still be maintained for a substantial amount of time.
>
> And ivtv-1.0.x will be supporting kernel >= 2.6.22? E.g. when several
> fixes make it into ivtv-1.0.x, but only appear at say 2.6.25, would we
> be able to build the module for 2.6.22 still?
Last I tried, ivtv (and support modules) in v4l-dvb compiled just fine
on 2.6.15.
--
Tyler Trafford
A sect or party is an elegant incognito devised to save a man from
the vexation of thinking.
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson, Journals, 1831
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
