On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 16:14 -0500, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > ----- "Andy Walls" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 19:35 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > > There is no particular order to these items. Most of these are hard > > or time > > > consuming to do. Otherwise I'd have done them by now :-) > > > > > > - Both cx18 and ivtv use IRQF_DISABLED when registering the irq. > > This flag is > > > bogus (and produces this annoying message in the log: > > 'IRQF_DISABLED is not > > > guaranteed on shared IRQs'). Note that many drivers do this. This > > is something > > > I discovered only recently. > > > > I naively asked near the end of this discussion on the LKML what is > > the > > preferred solution to fix the "problem": > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/30/486 > > > > No one answered. The whole thread was about the problem with > > IRQF_DISABLED not being honored and the need to run with interrupts > > disabled. > > I have heard it said that some developers appreciate a reminder if an LKML > conversation about their hobby horse seems to be passing them by. Without > my reading the whole thread, is such a target apparent?
My parser broke on your question. However, this part of the discussion by Tom Glexiner (the RT Linux guy) asks what I think are the right questions: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/30/215 That said, now I'm going to go back and read the whole thread just to come back up to speed on all the issues. Regards, Andy > Cheers, > -- jra _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
