On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:00:47PM -0800, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Wednesday 09 March 2005 11:32, Jasper van der Neut wrote: > [...] > > > It looks like there are two different LG TAPE tuners used on PAL PVR-150 > > > cards, because the current def seems to work perfectly for folks with > > > tuner idx=97. I'm looking at the datasheet for your tuner right now, > > > looks like another tuner definition is in order. > > > > > > > Hope you'll find the latest missing link. > > > > > > I believe I have. I'll try to whip up a patch in just a few... > > > > Attached patch is working for me. > > > > Patch is against 0.3.2h + tveeprom patch > > Please give the attached a try instead. Its against 0.3.2h, and includes all > my tuner and tveeprom changes for all three PAL PVR-150/500 variants. The > tuner def your patch modifies is the idx 97 tuner, so it shouldn't be > modified, you may break tuning for other people, I think. My patch includes > another tuner def for the idx 60 tuner, as well as the needed tveeprom update > to have it properly auto-detected.
Your patch does looks promising, indeed. > What is the other part of your patch for? "To prevent unnecessary charge pump action", see the remark on page 20 of the documentation. "Unnecessary charge pump action will result in very low tuning voltage which may drive the oscillator to extreme conditions." Jasper ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
