Hans, are you going to incorporate this patch into 0.4.x? Kirk
Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Monday 06 February 2006 22:45, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> I finally had time to look at the reported Samsung tuner problems and >> I discovered that I had forgotten to take a NTSC offset into account. >> The attached patch is for tuner.c from ivtv-0.4.2 and should correct >> all problems. Please test! >> >> I've also committed the change to ivtv-0.4 in subversion, so you can >> also you that for testing. >> >> Please let me know any test results asap as I also have to fix this >> before the 2.6.16 kernel is released. >> >> Hans > > Thanks to all the people who reported their test results. The new tuner > specification looks to be OK. The reported problems with certain > channels all are away from the frequency band boundaries as far as I > can tell so they do not appear to be related to this tuner spec. > > In my experience the PVR-500 is much more sensitive to the antenna > signal quality compared to the PVR-350 and this is even more true for > tuner 2 (extra interference?). A good antenna amplifier fixed the > problems for me. > > Anyway, the fixed Samsung tuner specification should be part of 2.6.16 > (I've mailed the patch against the latest 2.6.16-rc2 to the v4l-dvb > maintainer for inclusion in the next batch of patches for 2.6.16). > > Hans > > _______________________________________________ > ivtv-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
