Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 09 Nov 2006, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [this doesn't really belong here, but what the hell] > > True, we should continue this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to.
I will start off a thread there shortly. > I just note that your perception of the current state of Gump is > remarkably different from mine. And I fully respect that and appreciate you telling me so. But I want to say that I base my perception not on the percentage of failure that has been steadily increasing since that time we reached 100% years ago (that is probably a maven2 problem and therefore a technological one). I'm talking about the fact that gump has been incredibly slow at absorbing new project and new people. I'm talking about the fact that we never pass the "it's probably a gump fault" stage when something wrong shows up. I'm talking about the fact that people send gump emails to /dev/null because the signal/noise ratio is unbearable. and I can go on if you want :-) -- Stefano.
