Xavier, Changing packages names IMO is a major change. I don't think 1.5 is a good candidate for such a version.
IMO, you should start from ivy 2.0 with apache package names. That way, fixes to previous (backwards compatible) version would still be able to be done on ivy 1.x branch. I know you are going to tell me that no more changes are planned on 1.xbranch but from my experience in software development IT WILL BE! (keep my words :)) I don't know how many extension to ivy have been written so far, but please don't break their code at 1.x branch. easyproglife. On 11/13/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all, In the thread "Ivy future development" Steve and I have already agreed that the first version of Ivy on Apache should focus on: - package rename from fr.jayasoft to org.apache.ivy (I'm not sure for the apache package, maybe we should use something different?) - code refactorings aimed at code cleaning and better design, easing new developers involvment The reason for that is to be able to produce a first version on apache in a short time, and to ease contributions to the code. Do everybody agree on this focus? How could we name this version? 1.5? Xavier
