On 5/4/07, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/4/07, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1.
> >
> > It is cleaner.
> > Moreover, it adds an integration test to the build.
> The only thing we have to think about is to be able to fallback to use
> a provided ivy.jar, to still be able to build Ivy even if we introduce
> a problem in the core (at least to build the fix :-)).
>
> Xavier
Initially I also thought that. But it is actually not correct. The magic
is that you will only be able to build your fix ... if it fix the bug.
Indeed, you're absolutely right. I should be too tired after 4 days at
ApacheCon :)
Xavier
Am I wrong?
Gilles
--
Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
