Yes, I saw that, but could have been that they just would have been mosted to the next alpha 3 release, which would not be a good idea IMO.
Tjeerd On 7/3/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/3/07, Tjeerd Verhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it would be good to fix the following two issues before creating > the > alpha 2 release: > IVY-520 Variables not replaced during deliver > (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-520)< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-520> > IVY-481 Dependent jars missing in ivy binaries > (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-481)< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-520> > > No idea how mutch work the IVY-520 would be, but the IVY-481, should be > relative simple (I guess). John already provided a patch for 520, so it only requires reviewing, should be ok. 481 is not to complex, just requires some ant build changes. Both are already assigned to 2.0.0-alpha-2, so they are in the pipe before alpha 2. Thanks for reminding that. Xavier On 7/3/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 7/3/07, Scheper, Erik-Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 from me as well. > > > > > > BTW Is there already a release plan for the IVYDE (Eclipse IDE > > > integration)? > > > > > > No release plan for IvyDE so far. I think we first need to get > comfortable > > with apache releases for Ivy, then we will move some of our efforts to > > IvyDE. But the trunk is working, I use it daily. > > > > Xavier > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 3 juli 2007 12:15 > > > Aan: [email protected] > > > Onderwerp: AW: Release plan (was Re: Steps toward graduation) > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > * A release version would encourage people to play with Ivy. More than > > > with > > > an "old" release or a "check out from svn...". > > > * You could test and improve the release process. > > > * You could do the new packaging format, so people (and repositories) > > > would deal > > > with that. > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > >Von: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 11:42 > > > >An: [email protected] > > > >Betreff: Re: Release plan (was Re: Steps toward graduation) > > > > > > > >We talked about releasing an alpha 2 version early july, is it still > > > >something we want to do? It could be a good sign of progress for our > > > >users, and we have a pretty good number of fix and improvements to > > > >release it "as > > > >is" (it's still an alpha). > > > > > > > >What do you think? Shall I plan to cut a release this week and > > > >submit it to > > > >the vote? > > > > > > > >Xavier > > > > > > > >On 6/7/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 6/7/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > [B] We have done one release in the incubator, but we have > > > >no current > > > >> > release plan. This is something that we need to discuss in > > > >a separate > > > >> > thread. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> We need to discuss our release plan since this is one point > > > >required for > > > >> graduation, but also because it would be really nice for our > > > >user community > > > >> to better know where we intend to go. > > > >> > > > >> Establishing a road map for an open source project where > > > >only volunteers > > > >> are involved is not easy, because we can't be sure of the time we > > > >> (committers) will be able to involve in the project. > > > >However, Here are some > > > >> thoughts about our roadmap. > > > >> > > > >> First I think that it would really be nice if we could get > graduated > > > >> before shipping our final 2.0 release. About the content, I > > > >think we need > > > >> to concentrate on code cleanup, bug fixing, and maven 2 > > > >compatibility. The > > > >> cache management issue is also the most voted issue and thus > > > >I think it > > > >> would really be nice to get it implemented for this 2.0 release. > > > >> > > > >> According to the work involved, does a following road map make > sense: > > > >> 2.0-alpha-2 includes reviewed cache management + progress in code > > > >cleanup and bug fix, > > > >> API not stable yet > > > >> => early july > > > >> > > > >> 2.0-beta-1 > > > >> more bug fix and code cleanup, API almost stable, review of > tutorials > > > >> => late august > > > >> > > > >> 2.0-RC1 > > > >> all major known bug fixed, code cleanup finished for its > > > >most important > > > >> part (including all removal of _), published API stable, > > > >tutorials and > > > >> documentation updated > > > >> => late september > > > >> > > > >> 2.0-RCx > > > >> every two weeks, depending on the number of major bugs found > > > >> > > > >> 2.0 final > > > >> somewhere between october and november > > > >> > > > >> With this schedule we would have approximately one year > > > >between Ivy 1.4.1and Ivy > > > >> 2.0. This is long, but the migration to the ASF, code > > > >cleanup and some bug > > > >> fixes and improvement take time. Therefore this schedule seems to > be > > > >> something achievable and reasonable. > > > >> > > > >> WDYT? > > > >> > > > >> Xavier > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > > >> Manage your dependencies with Ivy! http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > > >Creator of Ivy, xooki and xoocode.org > > > >More about me: http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > Disclaimer: > > > This message contains information that may be privileged or > confidential > > > and is the property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its Group members. It > is > > > intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not > the > > > intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, > copy, > > > disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If > you > > > receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately > and > > > delete all copies of this message. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > Creator of Ivy, xooki and xoocode.org > > More about me: http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant Creator of Ivy, xooki and xoocode.org More about me: http://xhab.blogspot.com/
