Sorry, I see, I've been reading to fast over the previous text.
On 7/10/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/10/07, Tjeerd Verhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some Jira tips: > > When resolving a issue, you can also use the resolution: > - Won't fix > - Duplicate > Or simmular, in that case it also usual to not add a fix-version. > > When having a duplicate, create a link (duplicated by) to the other issue. > > When a issue is fixed in multiple branches, just use (ctrl-click) to mark > multple versions for which the issue is fixed. Thanks for the tips. For the issues discussed here, I think we have followed these tips. So it seems it makes sense to let ivy-433 and ivy-519 fixed without a version. Any other opinion? Xavier On 7/10/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 7/10/07, Scheper, Erik-Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I noticed that two issues are also marked as fixed, but not assigned > to > > > alpha-2 (ivy-433 and ivy-519). > > > > > > IVY-433 is a duplicate of IVY-404 which has been resolved in > 2.0.0-alpha-1 > > . > > I don't know the best practice about assigning fixed version for > > duplicates. > > If we assign it to the version in which the original has been fixed, it > > changes the changelogs of the version after its release... > > IVY-519 is a false issue. Should we consider fixed in one version, while > > it > > has probably never been a real issue? > > > > Also, three issues are marked for release 1.4.2 (of which 2 are marked > > > as fixed). > > > What about these? Are they also fixed in 2.0-alpha-2? > > > > > > They are also fixed in 2.0-alpha-1, but the issues are clean on this > > matter > > (marked as fixed both on 1.4.2 and 2.0-alpha-1). > > > > I presume there will never be a 1.4.2 release, right? > > > > > > I'm not sure. Both issues are fixed on the 1.4.x branch. This branch > will > > never be released at apache (old package names and so on). And jayasoft > > won't release it either (no more web site to announce and host it). So > if > > the community asks for a 1.4.2, the community will have to release it. > But > > the branch is present in our code base. > > > > Xavier > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Erik-Berndt Scheper > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Verzonden: maandag 9 juli 2007 19:47 > > > Aan: [email protected] > > > Onderwerp: 2.0.0 alpha 2 release > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm happy to say that all issues planned for 2.0 alpha 2 are resolved! > > > The last task is to update the release notes and cut the release. I'll > > > do that tomorrow morning and start a vote if nobody's object before > > > (you'll still have time to object during the vote :-)). The purpose of > > > this release is to provide a checkpoint about our progress in the > > > development of 2.0. This version still not has an emphasis on quality. > > > > > > Xavier > > > -- > > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/ > > > > > > Disclaimer: > > > This message contains information that may be privileged or > confidential > > > and is the property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its Group members. It > is > > > intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not > the > > > intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, > copy, > > > disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If > you > > > receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately > and > > > delete all copies of this message. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > http://www.xoocode.org/ > > > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
