On 8/16/07, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just found [1], and I was wonderiing if we don't fall under the > definition of ECCN 5D002 for our binary distribution with deps. In > this distribution we include binaries that support https, sftp (and > maybe other via vfs). > > Does that fall under the definition of ECCN 5D002 ?
Good question. Maybe this would deserve an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], where we could get more answers. My guess is that we are ok with what we provide, since we have already done a release approved by the IPMC. But it's only a guess, let's clarify this with the IPMC. Xavier PS: Note that if it is the case, there are probably a lot of other > project missing in [2] > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html > [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ > > -- > Gilles SCOKART > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
